I am still using Quicken 2004 I've never had a reason to "upgrade" before.2 QuickBooks for Mac 2020 User’s Guide Acknowledgments No single person can write a guide of this size and scope. Transfer data from Quicken 20162018, QuickBooks Desktop Mac 2016 and.Starting to think about what I'm going to do when Lion is out.seeing as how Lion will not support Rosetta. Mac Linux Games Android Follow OldVersion.comMicrosoft no longer provides security updates or support for PCs running Windows 7. Top 5 Contributors sofiane 41,005 Points PKO17. Blog comments powered by Disqus. Quicken Willmaker Plus 2004 Quicken Lawyer 2002 Deluxe Quicken for Windows 3 Quicken Basic for Windows 98 Quicken Basic 5.0c for Windows 3.1 Quicken 98 Quicken 2004 Deluxe Quicken Comments.Learn about our tax preparation services and receive your maximum refund today.Quicken's current Mac "offering," Quicken Essentials for Mac, appears from everything i have read/seen to be a substantial step backward in features and functionality. I’m very grateful for those guides.However, now that Lion will not include support for Rosetta or any PowerPC application, I am going to have to lay out some sort of upgrade plans.TaxSlayer is the easiest way to file your federal and state taxes online. Also, this book is a generation of other guides that came before it.I hate to have to start over.MoneyDance seems reasonably popular, but one worry I have is that Lion will also not include a Java runtime (even though it will be "easy" to install one.). I have little desire to buy Quicken 2007 first just to upgrade, especially as the only one I found online for sale is over $150!I have a ton of data in my Quicken file going back to the "early days" of this software, starting with the Windows version (sorry), running the Windows version under Wine on Linux, migrating to Mac - and spending days fixing import problems and the like. Further, as far as I can tell from the Intuit website, there is a migration strategy from Quicken Mac 2007 to Quick Essentials Mac, but there does not appear to be a migration strategy from Quicken 2004.
You can also tell it to auto label transactions based purely on the amount of the transaction - really useful for me since I pay my rent by check and so the only identifying information is that it's the same amount each month. Especially nice that it will show you potential duplicated transactions and color them based on how sure it is that the transaction is duplicated or not. Also their import auto tag/filters were pretty limited.I've been demoing See Finance for ~6 months and am pretty happy with it. I had lots of problems with account-account transfers not being duplicated on both ends. Too many problems with display/GUI bugs that would affect displayed account value (especially for stock portfolios) that I saw in v2 and continued to see in v3. That said, I used it for version 2 and 3 and I wouldn't recommend it. Google books downloader for windows and mac osThey are continuing to extend the online functionality of Quicken 2007 and sell it on their website until that new product is released, so perhaps that's at least some hint that it will be released eventually (in the past, online functionality "expired" about two years after the product appeared)Perhaps a dumb question: what can you do with these various financial packages that you cannot do with a well put-together spreadsheet? I have a big Excel workbook with all my finances and budgets that I extend out column-wise every few weeks.Your question is like any other question of the sort: why buy a specialized program dedicated to a task rather than hacking it together in spreadsheet or a database? For instance: why use an address book program when you can do it yourself in Excel? It depends on how much time you want to spend on re-inventing this task, how much you care about the task itself, and what you want out of it.For $30-$60, you don't have to re-invent accounting in a spreadsheet. Who knows whether that will appear before Lion, but there's a chance at least. It may still work for me as I don't do online bill paying, but i do track investments and it sounds like this product has limited or no support for that level of functionalityWell, last spring when Intuit was getting blasted for the deficiencies of Quicken Essentials, Intuit said two things: 1) those with non-online investment accounts to track should stick with Quicken 2007, 2) a full featured new version of Quicken for Mac will eventually appear (perhaps in 2011).So, they did promise an updated version at some point. That said, every time I've emailed them, I've received a response within 24 hours.Quicken's current Mac "offering," Quicken Essentials for Mac, appears from everything i have read/seen to be a substantial step backward in features and functionality. Quicken 2004 S Download Transactions FromApparently you can never delete that data from their servers.Also, I don't know why people want both checkbook or bank transactions in the same application as investment tracking.I thought iBank 4 was great at first - it let me download transactions from Discover, which Quicken 2006 never did, and it did a really nice job reconciling them with entries I'd keyed in by hand. No problem, as I don't do that many transactions.Also tried Checkbook Free, which imported QIF but the transactions didn't match the dates or the balances.And what is a good investment tracking program? One that can save snapshots say or do lookup of mutual fund and ETF prices? Or do they all depend on logging into your brokers' site and pulling the data?Kind of leery about services like Mint, which requires giving over your login and passwords. It simply downloads information from your bank and you have to hope & pray that the information is correct.So what's a good checkbook management program, especially one with an iOS app? I'm using PocketMoney Lite but it's manual entry, no chance of importing QIF files or anything like that. It doesn't let you enter in transactions and then reconcile them later, nor does it let you schedule transactions. This may be more realistic for how stock transactions work underneath it all, but it seems like twice as much work for me, and it's not clear there's a gain there. You're supposed to move cash into the account, and then use that cash to purchase the investment, at which point your money disappears into the stock. But, the way iBank deals with money market or other investment accounts takes a different mindset. We're talking "cannot save, here's problem 1 of 57" dialogs.There's not a lot of *data* in those accounts, so I considered not importing those bits from Quicken 2006, and just entering them by hand. Except for my money market account, which gave it serious fits. It didn't fill me with confidence that using it would ever be a smooth process, merely adequate.The promise of a 60-day money back refund lured me into buying Quicken Essentials. It was the little things - having a blank entry at the bottom to type into, or being able to hit +/-/t to increment or reset date fields, or generating a report and being able to see all the individual items in the categories in the report at once, instead of having to click on a category at a time to drill down. The rest of it seemed OK, but I liked Quicken better. Suggestions? I downloaded SEE Finance, but have to admit I didn't give it a fair shake. I gave it a file of a year's worth of downloaded transactions, and it said, "Sure!" and just added them all in, no questions asked, without any attempt to find the duplicates.Running Quicken under Windows feels like letting the terrorists win, but it's becoming more tempting. However, I was shocked when there was no reconciliation process at all. If any of your banks decides to change something up, or just not play ball with Mint.com, it means you may not have access to that account in Mint for a while, and that just isn't ok.The other dealbreaker is that it fails as a real budgeting tool. As cool of an idea as it is to automatically aggregate the transactions from all of your accounts, it's just too prone to errors. The result of putting your budget on auto-pilot is that it is very unreliable, and the first and foremost requirement is that it just plain works, always. Sometimes you'll lose access to your accounts, or there are importing issues that cause errors like duplicate transactions. Should I look harder?My wife and I just made the decision to move away from Mint.Because of the attempts to automate everything, there are many times when things just don't work right. For us, this meant that balances that should have been accruing in other under-spent categories were eaten up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJames ArchivesCategories |